Comments on: Episode 70: Under the Microscope http://wikipediaweekly.org/2009/01/26/episode-70-under-the-microscope/ The only podcast for Wikimedians! Covering the news, policies, controversies and interviews with the people of Wikipedia and Wikimedia in general. Mon, 15 Feb 2010 02:02:30 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Andrew Lih http://wikipediaweekly.org/2009/01/26/episode-70-under-the-microscope/comment-page-1/#comment-12299 Andrew Lih Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:00:46 +0000 http://wikipediaweekly.org/?p=123#comment-12299 I think many Wikipedia editors would say, "What's a typewriter?" I think many Wikipedia editors would say, “What’s a typewriter?”

]]> By: Awadewit http://wikipediaweekly.org/2009/01/26/episode-70-under-the-microscope/comment-page-1/#comment-12114 Awadewit Mon, 09 Feb 2009 09:23:28 +0000 http://wikipediaweekly.org/?p=123#comment-12114 Inline citations are not hard or even annoying. Haven't you heard the nightmarish stories about adding footnotes to dissertations on a typewriter? Please, some perspective here. Inline citations are not hard or even annoying. Haven’t you heard the nightmarish stories about adding footnotes to dissertations on a typewriter? Please, some perspective here.

]]> By: Kiko Cherman http://wikipediaweekly.org/2009/01/26/episode-70-under-the-microscope/comment-page-1/#comment-11894 Kiko Cherman Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:41:09 +0000 http://wikipediaweekly.org/?p=123#comment-11894 Great podcast. I would like to let you guys know about wikipediawithads.com It is Wikipedia, with ads!! You guys should comment that on the next podcast. Great podcast. I would like to let you guys know about wikipediawithads.com

It is Wikipedia, with ads!! You guys should comment that on the next podcast.

]]>